Technical faults on the leftist journalism

A day after the judgment of the Strasbourg Court saying that Mr. Gómez de Liaño had not an independent and impartial judgment, the leftist journalism is saying that this is a technical fault on the judgment, and that, at the end, is a delinquent judge, insistint on that: of course, prevarication.

Well, there is clearly a default or a symptom on the leftists that is spread all over the Spanish society: only them are right. The conservatives are always wrong. Under that premise, everything that is against them, against their ideology, against their business (at least, this is all) is wrong and must be destroyed. They, the leftists, are the only ones who can teach the society (and thus the conservative) on how to solve all the problems, on what is social politics, human rights and all that list of nonsenses that are mentioned when the leftists do not have nothing useful to say. This is the so called moral supremacy of the leftists. The real leimotif of the left.

An idea that is false. And an argument is this: the conservative did, on all the last century, a huge reflection about the different anomalies of the right, such as Hitler, Franco, Mussolini… The leftists did not do anything about their anomalies: Pol Pot, Stalin, Fidel Castro. But their propaganda is better.

Back to the judgment: there is something ridiculous, not to say stupid, to insist on the mistake. The Strasbourg Court sentenced the Spanish government because the trial was not just. Neither impartial. So the judges were not partial. So the sentence is contaminated. So an impartial court surely did not condemned Mr. Gómez de Liaño to nothing, and surely allowed him to continue with the investigations in the denunciation against the Grupo Prisa.

It is cristal clear that there are technical faults on the leftist journalism. A cancer of words.

~ by gerenton on July 24, 2008.

Leave a Reply